Occupational risk assessment report

Employer / organization​ No. Document number​ dated Document date

Scope: Departments, workplaces and types of work​. Survey period: Survey start date — Survey end date. Basis and assessors: Basis and membership of the commission / assessors​.

The assessment was conducted as part of occupational risk management under Articles 214 and 218 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation (ТК РФ). Method: risk matrix. Scales, criteria, method details and limitations: Approved method: details, scales, acceptability criteria and limitations​. Survey materials: The survey includes a walk-through of the premises and workplaces, observation of routine and non-routine operations, discussions with employees, and analysis of instructions, equipment documentation, special assessment of working conditions (СОУТ) results, incidents and previous measures. For inaccessible sites, record the limitations rather than an absence of hazards.

Additional details based on actual conditions: Sites inspected, employees interviewed and documents used​.

A hazard is described as a source and a possible event with consequences for the employee. Work, setup, cleaning, repairs, movement and contractor access are taken into account. Each hazard is assigned a stable ID linking it to the assessment card and action plan.

Additional details based on actual conditions: Hazard register: workplace, source, event, exposure and consequences​

Each hazard is assessed, taking account of measures actually in place. Scores are substantiated by observations; an absence of accidents does not in itself demonstrate a low likelihood.

Additional details based on actual conditions: Results: hazard ID, initial scores, calculation, level and rationale​

Priority of measures: eliminate the hazard; replace the hazardous process with a less hazardous one; introduce engineering controls and collective protection; organize safe working practices; provide personal protective equipment (СИЗ). An immediate threat requires an immediate response before the scheduled deadline.

Additional details based on actual conditions: Action plan: risk ID, action, person responsible, deadline, resource, verification criterion​

Surveyed places are included in the register; places not inspected and limitations are identified separately. Unacceptable risks are referred to the head of the organization for work restrictions and resource allocation. Measures and monitoring are established for other risks. A calculated threshold not being exceeded does not remove mandatory safety requirements. Additional details based on actual conditions: Conclusions, unresolved issues and survey limitations​ Review procedure: A review is initiated when technology, equipment, materials or workplaces change, a new hazard is identified, an incident occurs, measures prove ineffective or mandatory requirements change. The person responsible records the trigger, arranges a survey and communicates the revised measures to employees. Additional details based on actual conditions: Triggers, persons responsible and date of next review​. Attachments: List of assessment cards, survey records and other attachments​. Risk assessment does not replace the special assessment of working conditions. Decisions on whether work may proceed take account of mandatory requirements, not only the numerical index. Prepared by and signatures: Prepared by: full names, positions and space for each signature​ Approved by:

Signatory's position​ ______________ / Head's full name​ /

The method version and scales are applied consistently in all assessment cards.